This is the first time
I've ever let someone else write a Blog post here, but I figured regular
readers who are interested in the sort of things I write about would probably
be interested in this, taken from the intriguing book that is Superfreakonomics by Steven D. Levitt
and Stephen J. Dubner. If you're anything like me, you'll probably notice the
trade-off between counter-intuitiveness and rationality, and that there's a
sleight of hand going on in order to make the argument fly, but it's something
you'll likely be glad you got to consider:
Many of life’s decisions are hard. Some decisions,
meanwhile, are really, really easy. Imagine you’ve gone to a party at a
friend’s house. He lives only a mile away. You have a great time, perhaps
because you drank four glasses of wine. Now the party is breaking up. While
draining your last glass, you dig out your car keys. Abruptly you conclude this
is a bad idea: you are in no condition to drive home.
For the past few decades, we’ve been rigorously
educated about the risks of driving under the influence of alcohol. A drunk
driver is thirteen times more likely to cause an accident than a sober one. And
yet a lot of people still drive drunk. In the United States , more than 30 percent
of all fatal crashes involve at least one driver who has been drinking. During
the late- night hours, when alcohol use is greatest, that proportion rises to
nearly 60 percent. Overall, 1 of every 140 miles is driven drunk, or 21 billion
miles each year.
Why do so many people get behind the wheel after
drinking? Maybe because— and this could be the most sobering statistic yet—
drunk drivers are rarely caught. There is just one arrest for every 27,000
miles driven while drunk. That means you could expect to drive all the way
across the country, and then back, and then back and forth three more times,
chugging beers all the while, before you got pulled over. As with most bad
behaviors, drunk driving could probably be wiped out entirely if a strong-
enough incentive were instituted— random roadblocks, for instance, where drunk
drivers are executed on the spot— but our society probably doesn’t have the
appetite for that.
Meanwhile, back at your friend’s party, you have made
what seems to be the easiest decision in history: instead of driving home,
you’re going to walk. After all, it’s only a mile. You find your friend, thank
him for the party, and tell him the plan. He heartily applauds your good
judgment. But should he? We all know that drunk driving is terribly risky, but
what about drunk walking? Is this decision so easy?
Let’s look at some numbers. Each year, more than 1,000
drunk pedestrians die in traffic accidents. They step off sidewalks into city
streets; they lie down to rest on country roads; they make mad dashes across
busy highways. Compared with the total number of people killed in alcohol-
related traffic accidents each year— about 13,000— the number of drunk
pedestrians is relatively small. But when you’re choosing whether to walk or
drive, the overall number isn’t what counts. Here’s the relevant question: on a
per- mile basis, is it more dangerous to drive drunk or walk drunk?
The average American walks about a half- mile per day
outside the home or workplace. There are some 237 million Americans sixteen and
older; all told, that’s 43 billion miles walked each year by people of driving
age. If we assume that 1 of every 140 of those miles are walked drunk— the same
proportion of miles that are driven drunk— then 307 million miles are walked
drunk each year.
Doing the math, you find that on a per- mile basis, a
drunk walker is eight times more likely to get killed than a drunk driver.
There’s one important caveat: a drunk walker isn’t likely to hurt or kill
anyone other than her- or himself. That can’t be said of a drunk driver. In
fatal accidents involving alcohol, 36 percent of the victims are either
passengers, pedestrians, or other drivers. Still, even after factoring in the
deaths of those innocents, walking drunk leads to five times as many deaths per
mile as driving drunk.
So as you leave your friend’s party, the decision
should be clear: driving is safer than walking. (It would be even safer,
obviously, to drink less, or to call a cab.) The next time you put away four
glasses of wine at a party, maybe you’ll think through your decision a bit
differently. Or, if you’re too far gone, maybe your friend will help sort
things out. Because friends don’t let friends walk drunk.
No comments:
Post a Comment