Alas,
even though these great men make it difficult to say anything original on free
speech, if what they've said has been forgotten by modern politicians to the
extent that the qualities they propounded are gradually being eroded away by
our ever-increasing nanny state authorities, there will always be the need for
a reminder.
The general wisdom that has
been distilled from these great writers on our liberty of free expression is that
we will not agree with every opinion being proffered, but we should defend
everyone's freedom to proffer those opinions. We should do this not just to
protect the right of the person with the opinion, but also to protect our right
to hear opinions too. In other words, in denying someone the right to voice an
opinion, we at the same time deny ourselves access to that opinion, so we
decline the opportunity to hear something that may
differ from the consensus or challenge widely held viewpoints.
We may not agree with
everything we hear, and some of the things we hear may be vile, controversial
or damn stupid, but we do ourselves an injustice if we fail to hear the
dissenting voices, because even the most discordant and discrepant opinions may
contain within them at least a grain of truth. Therefore we should be impelled
to consider them carefully, for in doing so we force ourselves to question how
we know what we do and whether the sources from whence our knowledge came were
reliable and verifiable.
When it comes to free
speech, then, so long as no threat is being made, or slanderous or libellous
lie about a person being told, or employer/employer protocols breached, it is
in our best interests to have complete freedom to say/write down whatever we
wish, however controversial or repugnant.
Sadly, it becomes ever more
apparent nowadays that these important principles regarding free speech are
being gradually forgotten, or in some cases deliberately eroded away, by the
kind of charmless busybodies who would call for the arrest of a Tweeter or the
sacking of an MP or journalist who says something they don't like. As is
evident to anyone with even the sketchiest understanding of human nature and
basic philosophical familiarity, the more censorious and nannified we become the
more we become prisoners of our interference.
* Photo courtesy of sodahead.com