Even though pretty much
everyone is behaving as though pretty much everything has changed, the reality
is, pretty much nothing has changed. The EU referendum was always an advisory
result that needed to be ratified by Parliament, so Theresa May was never going
to be able to invoke Article 50 and start formal exit negotiations with the EU
without the House of Commons vote taking place.
And apart from the odd
disgraceful public servant who should be shown the door, the majority of
MPs will honour the referendum and vote leave, even if they are in
constituencies where remain has the majority vote. The reason being, MPs that
defy the will of the British people are unlikely to survive after the next
general election, which means individual MPs are more likely to respect
the referendum result.
As for whether it's a
hard, soft, clean or messy Brexit, well the reality is, it probably won't make
all that much difference long term, because the mid-to-long-term future
of the EU is about as sticky as a lorry full of treacle spilling its load
in the middle of the channel tunnel.
Here’s the thing, it’s
fairly straightforward. Anyone with even a sketchy understanding of the very
basics of trade and competition should know that any country that leaves the
EU’s protectionist bloc will be better off in the medium to long term (there
are usually short term shocks and tumults with radical breaks from the status
quo, so don’t let it fool you).
This can be understood by
anyone who understands why artificially constructed free trade inhibitors make
the people within the border worse off as well as those on the outside
(something I also covered in the articles attached to the above hyperlink).
You see, this is the first
generation of people in the world's history that has had access to the entire
world's knowledge, and moreover the ability to communicate so freely at a
global level. My prediction involves two main things happening: 1) wider
understanding of how trade and competition bolster people's economic
well-being, and 2) wider understanding of how politicians retard this process.
Both are likely to happen
at some point in the future - it's hard to say precisely when - but what this
means is that the EU is being allowed to get away with its stultifying
practices only for as long as it can continue to not get found out by a larger
number of people.
What they have been getting
away with is a socialistic protectionist bloc set up and run to favour its two
largest single currency member states - Germany
and France .
It should be remembered that the European Union was
originally a creation of American post-war foreign policy as a bulwark against
the communist forces of the Soviet Union . The
American plan, tacit though it might have been, was to keep European nations in
check against ideologies it felt were threatening or economically repressive.
It was a very
unnatural political union. As time went on the EU trade bloc became more and
more evidently a sovereignty-stripping monolith used to gradually mould other
EU members into the Franco-German line, guarding them against competitive
forces and globalised free trade. In other words, the main beneficiaries of EU
policies have been Germany
and France ,
its two biggest economies, both having their interests best served by the rules
they create.
For
most of that time France has
been like a microcosmic version of the union to which it is conjoined - protectionist
over its own citizens, whereby local French connections are encouraged, with Germany ,
being the EU's strongest export country, having the most to gain from the EU
and the most to lose by its gradual dismantlement.
While
all this has been going on, numerous smaller European nations have lost out
big-time by supplanting their own national currencies for the Euro, thereby
ending their ability to competitively trade their currency against other
currencies, and adjusting their fiscal and monetary policies in accordance with
market signals. Not to mention that Eurozone nations were able to borrow money
far more cheaply with the single currency than their with own currency, which,
as is plain for all the world to see, has been an economic disaster for them.
Even
if we put aside all the other things that are drastically wrong with the EU,
the current situation is rather like this. Germany is like a big company that
wants to sell some of its premises to smaller businesses (Ireland, Cyprus,
Greece, Portugal and then followed by Italy and Spain) but will also willingly
loan the money to the buyers in the hope that they make enough of a success of
their businesses to pay them back, but do so by rigging the terms so that debtor
submission was always a highly likely culmination - one that domestic politicians
surreptitiously pass on to their taxpayers.
But,
alas, because of the failing economies of those in debt, paying Germany back is
hugely problematical, with the inevitable outcome being the European Central Bank trying to keep domestic banks' heads above water by
printing more currency and attempting to hold it in spite of the numerous
Eurozone liabilities, not to mention the huge public sector expenditure crisis
that's hitting the whole of Europe (including the UK) and will only get worse as
domestic governments try desperately hard work to out how to untangle themselves
from public sector knots without getting strung up by the electorate.
Mark my words, and remember
where you read them, because quite simply, very few people are telling you the
truth about the future of the EU and how it is going to be torn to shreds as
more and more member states look to follow us in tearing ourselves away.
You may think it's hard to
imagine the EU not existing in a form similar to its current set-up, but
radical future differences are hard to predict. And one only need imagine how
many radical changes someone from the 60s or 70s would have failed to predict
about the 40 or 50 years that followed to get an idea of how radically
different our future Europe can be. The day when even the staunchest Remainers thank their lucky stars
they are not in the EU will, I'm confident, be a reality at some point in the
next decade or two - much like how those that used to argue fervently for the UK to adopt the Euro are now doubly glad we didn't.