Let me tell you about two products from Starbucks.
There is a regular Cappuccino, for which you'll pay about £2:
By pricing similar products at different prices, what you're basically saying is: if you're the sort of customer who is price sensitive you'll probably buy the Cappuccino for £2, and if you're not you'll probably buy something more expensive, like the Mocha at £3.50. Let me expand this to other examples. Suppose Sainsbury's added 20% to the price of 30% of its wine, vegetables, linseed and sunglasses - those who are price sensitive would seek out the cheapest products on the other shelves - and those who are not would hardly notice they are paying more.
Have you wondered why in supermarkets the 'own brand' cheaper varieties look so unappealing in package design? They are mostly plain and un-alluring, but for good reason. The 'own brand' product appeals to very price-sensitive people, but it is also there to make more expensive alternative products more appealing. Someone who wants the cheapest corn flakes possible won't worry about the awful Tesco own brand packaging - she'll be glad of the savings. Others will consider the extra money well worth it to have Kellogg’s - and Tesco does not mind either way.
Here are other examples. When attending music festivals, price sensitive people will bring as much of their own food and alcohol as they can - those who aren't bothered and would rather have less to carry from the car to the tent area will just pay the marked-up festival prices. Hotels offer discounted prices on the Internet because they know that Internet shoppers are more price-sensitive bargain hunters. That's also why mini-bars have such expensive drinks - they know many guests won't pay for anything, choosing instead to get their water, fruit juice and beer from a near-by supermarket, but they know that guests who are not price sensitive won't worry too much about paying extortionate prices if it saves them having to go to the shop. Similarly in terms of prices paid for London transport, Oyster cards are there for price sensitive travellers, and full fares are like mini bars - they are there for those who are so insensitive to price that they can't even take the time, or have no need to take the time, to get an Oyster card (many tourists, for example).
As well
as price discrimination, there are other factors that dictate prices - factors
that go beyond customer price sensitivity. An example of
a hiked up price with a rationale behind it is restaurant desserts. Have you
noticed how desserts are disproportionately expensive in restaurants compared
to the main meal? You can pay £10 for a big meal with meat and all the
trimmings, and yet you can pay £5 to £6 for a couple of scoops of ice cream
thereafter. But there is a good reason why: the value of the ice
cream is not what you are being charged for primarily, it is the value of the
table time*. While you're extending your stay to order and then eat dessert,
you are taking up a table that otherwise could be sold to waiting customers who
want to order a main meal. Naturally sometimes there'll be no waiting
customers, other times there'll be several - but the restaurant can't know in
advance, so it can't fluctuate its prices every half an hour according to
demand, it must set fixed prices to allow for it.
Pricing is all about
getting the balance right. Take pubs and tap water. Most pubs don't charge for
a glass of water, but some do. Why should they charge for tap water that's so
readily available and at such a small cost? It's for a similar reason to the
price of desserts - water is a substitute for other liquid - while you're in
the pub drinking water you're not drinking coke or lemonade or beer. Giving you
a glass of water means giving you a substitute for the thing they are trying to
sell - pub drinks. Now in most cases water drinkers are sparse; sometimes they
appear alongside friends who are drinking other drinks bought at the bar, or
they have water with a meal - and it is because of their sparseness that
most pubs do not make a charge for water. Those that did probably would find
the gains would be outweighed by the losses - water drinkers and their friends
may well choose a different pub - one that makes no charge for water.
So why, then, are there so many Black Friday
squabbles?
After reading all that
about price discrimination and price sensitivity, it should be easy to see
what's really going on in that 24 hour Black Friday period. If we need toilet
paper, petrol or a new washing machine to replace the one that broke yesterday,
we can't be too sensitive to whether those items are on sale or not - we have
to make the purchases. In other words, they are not discretionary purchases. Now
a lot of the things people buy on Black Friday are discretionary purchases -
people buy them because they are on sale, but they wouldn't otherwise buy them.
So on ordinary days shops set their prices to attract price insensitive
shoppers, with sale items being for price sensitive customers. On a day like
Black Friday stores know that price sensitive shoppers will be out in their
droves, with price insensitive customers likely to stay away to avoid the
crowds and squabbles. The less well off you are, the more price sensitive you are likely to be, so the more keen you'll be to struggle at close quarters among the crowds to grab that bargain you couldn't otherwise afford. It's easy to see a couple of instances of civil unrest on the news and look upon Black Friday with utter regret (and yes, there are plenty of things about the concept to regret) - but to only have a downer on it would be to overlook the obvious gains. The millions spent yesterday will be a huge boost to businesses and their employees, as well as being a huge benefit to the tens of thousands of consumers who are currently struggling and couldn't afford to pay the non-discounted prices, but now have something they wanted.
* And to some extent the same applies
to starters