Now let's be absolutely
clear: the slave trade was horrific, despicable and a truly abhorrent legacy
for which some of our ancestors ought to have felt much shame, regret and
contrition. But that sentiment must apply to - and only apply to - people who were personally
involved, and people around at the time who didn't do enough to stop it - it is certainly not David Cameron's duty to apologise
or offer financial restitution for these past crimes against humanity.
The very basis of
contrition, regret and atonement is that we are moral agents who must take
responsibility for our own actions, not the actions of people we've never met
and to whom we have no personal connection.
But there is another point
to this opprobrious news story: in asking us to live in the past, the valuable
notion of 'moving on' and acknowledging the progress that has been made in the
intervening time is being diminished, which to me smacks of treating the
current people of Jamaica a little too trivially and disrespectfully. It sees
to me rather patronising to talk of the citizens of Jamaica as being people so stuck in
the past that they haven't moved on and are still preoccupied with righting the
wrongs of history.
Perhaps they are, but I
would like to think not: for if there is one valuable thing to be learned from
being human it is that harbouring resentments from the past is rather like
pouring hot coals on your own head and expecting it to burn the scalp of your
enemy. Imagine how much that truism is magnified when the people who've done
the wronging did so at a time when your grandparents weren't even born.