Economic
growth has meant that in the developed world there are now more classes of
people. Take Britain and America
as prime cases in point. While the majority of the population were once easily
categorised as either upper or lower class (with middle coming later), nowadays
the elite and the upper class have split, as have the middle class, where we
now have the traditional group and a new group that extends all the way into
numerous tenets of the white collar groups.
Then there is a large group of
factory workers and service-industry workers, and an even larger group of
low-skilled workers whose wages need to be topped up with government in-work
benefits. Lastly, there is a large group of the very poorest in society - those
relying on welfare, and those for whom the prospect of a job is pretty narrow.
The
reason we have more class groups (if it's even helpful to use the word 'class')
is because we have more levels of industry and an increased range of working
groups with varying skill requirements. This has a twofold bearing (or should
do) on people in terms of progress. In the first place, the brightest, most
talented and most aspirational in any group can more easily ascend upwards to
the next most desirable group.
And
in the second place, despite popular perceptions to the contrary, the people to
be most concerned about are not the people several groups up from you, but the
people competing with you in your group.
In other words, if you're in the low-skilled group your biggest rivals in the labour market are other people in your group. If a low-skilled immigrant comes into theUK and joins the job market, he
doesn't disadvantage Alan Sugar or James Dyson, he
disadvantages fellow immigrants and low-skilled British people.
The other factor beneficial to growth is that this new look economy has a lot more competition as businesses from all groups are competing with one another to improve the goods and services they provide.
In other words, if you're in the low-skilled group your biggest rivals in the labour market are other people in your group. If a low-skilled immigrant comes into the
The other factor beneficial to growth is that this new look economy has a lot more competition as businesses from all groups are competing with one another to improve the goods and services they provide.
The
other system of demarcation is found in a natural caste system of establishment
power. It used to be that the hierarchy consisted of military power, government
power (most notably, the civil service), business power, and then cascading down to
civilian power.
Given that the civilian group is always the largest group, there needs to be either a force of oppression to maintain the power, or in the case of a more modern parliamentary system a voluntary delegation of power.
Given that the civilian group is always the largest group, there needs to be either a force of oppression to maintain the power, or in the case of a more modern parliamentary system a voluntary delegation of power.
The
main change in order over the centuries is that while military power used to
have leadership over government (and in some cases be the same thing), now
elected governments have more authority than the military. In many prosperous
countries the role of business is becoming ever-more influential in the state
of affairs too.
You'll
find that while in places like Europe and America this system has been well
established for many decades (nearly three centuries in Europe, about half that
time in America) other places throughout the world don't have such stability, as
military dominance and (often corrupt) political governance are two wings of
the same oppression.
For example, in places like Burma
and North Korea and Pakistan
the military oppression of its citizens is concomitant with governmental
powers, as is the case in some African countries. In other African and Middle
Eastern countries, the military/government duality of rule is underpinned by
theocratic influences too, making the situation even more oppressive and
totalitarian for the majority of its citizens.
The
emergence of a multi-class society goes hand in hand with an emergent economy,
where economic growth has engendered increased prosperity (in absolute gains) for
almost everybody in this country. A couple of hundred years ago, almost
everybody in the country was desperately poor. Now almost nobody is desperately
poor.
It is because fewer and fewer people are desperately poor that we have a
multi-class society, with at least two tiers of the middle class, and emergent services
workers and an affluent working class group all doing better than ever. There's
still a lot of hardship in society, but a multi-class society is one of those
human constructs of demarcation to illustrate how life has got so much better
for large proportions of society.
No comments:
Post a Comment