One of the peculiar things
about the current political and economic landscape is politicians'
preoccupation with the UK
manufacturing industry, and how important it apparently is to reconstitute some
of our past manufacturing glories. It's true we once had past dominance in the
manufacturing industries (along with about a dozen other leading countries),
but just because people of past generations have been accustomed to something
doesn't mean things should always stay the same.
When making things was the
primary way to earn a living, and physical labour and extracting raw materials
provided the substrate for big business, it was understandable that people were
emotionally wedded to Britain 's
place in the global manufacturing industry. For most, their living depended on
it. But the world has changed a lot.
Nowadays other nations have both the
absolute and comparative advantage in manufacturing goods, and we have both the
absolute and comparative advantage in providing services. IT, design,
marketing, consultation, financial, legal, real estate, health care and
advertising are huge industrial job creators, as are restaurants, hotels, bars
and holiday services. These are based more on technical and financial
assistance, leisure, entertainment, health and well-being than on physical
labour and making things with raw materials.
Manufacturing
things simply isn’t the source of high value, high wages or big profits like it
was in the past. In fact, the UK
is made better off when we have a manufacturing trade deficit with countries
than can produce goods cheaper and more efficiently than we can.
Not only is it
an oddity how politicians hanker for manufacturing, and galvanise people into
believing that that is what they should be shouting for; it is equally odd how
so many people don't understand that when other countries have the manufacturing
advantage over us in terms of cheapness, quality and efficiency, it is a good
thing that we buy our stuff from them, and not produce it ourselves.
No comments:
Post a Comment