
In a recent Blog post on Israel, I lamented how it has become increasingly fashionable among a certain
segment of self-styled activists – most of whom come across as politically
unseasoned and woefully underinformed - to adopt a fiercely anti-Israel stance,
parroting slogans with the zeal of conviction but none of the burden of
understanding. From a biblical perspective, it's unsurprising to me that so
many modern people have a particular zeal against Israel - I believe it is
frequently a disguised rejection of God. The Bible consistently presents Israel
as central to God's redemptive plan, and I think that the anti-Israel stance
that has emerged with such fervour has a lot to do with resistance to God's
redemptive plan in general. I will elaborate on this shortly - and just to be
clear, in saying this, I am not speaking against the genuine concerns that
Israel's recent conduct towards some Palestinian civilians has started to
become disproportionate to the cause, because there are some valid concerns
there.
No, I am talking about how
the huge rise in anti-Israel rhetoric (or in some cases antisemitism couched in
anti-Israel rhetoric) is driven by a deep anti-Christ complex. What is often
portrayed as a principled stand for justice is, in reality, a lazy moral
absolutism that flattens decades of complex history into a social media
soundbite or a trip to London to embarrass themselves with reactionary placards. Much of this outrage is driven not by a sincere grasp of the
Arab-Israeli conflict, but by the ideological fervour of left-wing extremism
that is oblivious to nuance and reduces geopolitics to a grossly oversimplified
binary them vs. us mentality. This dogmatic lens not only insults the
intelligence of anyone with a balanced mind, but also does a disservice to the
actual people - Israeli and Palestinian alike - whose lives are shaped by the
long-standing, tragic and tangled realities of this conflict.
My usual stance is to
begin any Middle East conversation by stating that no party, group (or side if
you prefer) comes out of this situation unimpeached – few who have influence
are without fault in the conflict, which is highly complex and goes back decades,
and in some cases, even longer. And that remains the case here. And in a post
from a few years ago, I humbly submitted that the following propositions are
probably true, regarding the conflict:
1) The
religious/ethnic/cultural/political connotations of this conflict are highly
complex, and go back centuries.
2) Both sides have a long
and complicated history, in which both are at fault for their sub-optimal,
reactionary treatment of the other group.
3) As usual, the innocent
(and majority) Israeli and Arab citizens are the biggest victims of the actions
of those driving the religious/ethnic/cultural/political agendas.
4) Hamas and other Islamic
terrorist/fundamentalist groups are so dreadful that they are never going to be
reasoned with or be seekers of a peaceful solution.
5) Those driving the
Israeli religious/ethnic/cultural/political agendas have played their part in
the division by treating many Palestinian citizens badly too, especially by
enforcing a system of oppression against the Palestinian people.
6) At least some of the
motives for Israel's restrictions on the Palestinians ought to be considered
with regard to historical Arab desire to wipe out Jews/Israel and deny Israel
its right to exist.
7) All the aforementioned
mutual maltreatment is not ethically justified by the above observations, but
probably goes a long way towards explaining them.
8} A two-state solution is
frequently suggested as the best recourse, but as well as over-simplifying the
history, it comes with two fundamental issues: Firstly, neither side really
wants this solution, or behaves like they could achieve such a thing; and
Secondly, deeply embedded religious/ethnic/cultural/political beliefs that date
back centuries make it prohibitively unlikely that they could agree on how it
would be implemented, especially given the deeply, age-old held religious
beliefs about whose Holy Land it is.
I’m shocked that a wicked
terrorist organisation like Hamas gains so much support from coddled left wing
minds – it can only be explained by wilful ignorance, disguised compassion and
selective virtue-signalling. But even though I’m shocked, I’m not that
surprised; the West has a crisis of critical thinking, especially in the young
- it makes them adopt the vilest opinions at times. You should know if you
don’t already that the Hamas Charter includes “Destroying Israel and
establishing an Islamic theocracy in Palestine is essential”, and “Unrestrained
jihad is necessary to achieve this.” The covenant proclaims that Israel will
exist until Islam obliterates it, and jihad against Jews is required until
Judgement Day. Compromise over the land is forbidden. The documents promote
holy war as divinely ordained, reject political solutions, and call for
instilling these views in children. It’s hard to believe so many Western
radicals are actually arguing for Hamas to be seen as being less horrid,
selling themselves a lurid fantasy that all the torture, decapitation, rape and
people being burned alive is just their peaceful way of hinting at a harmonious
two state solution.
The ongoing need to
protect Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state in a region with a long
history of hostility should be evident. And as I said, while Israel doesn’t
come out of this without some justified criticism, there is absolutely no
justification for this awful swathe of anti-Semitic prejudice against Jews –
historically they are a tremendous people with an excellent written tradition
and many great innovators. The Jewish people are an insecure group - and
understandably so, after being subjected to the Holocaust, continually being
threatened with the eradication of their existence, repeatedly being victims of
aggression by neighbouring Middle Eastern nations (thankfully all of whom they
are much more powerful than militarily), and also being on the receiving end of
some extreme factions of the Palestinian people - factions that are letting
down their fellow Palestinians, who are innocent civilians trying to obtain
basic human rights and not be oppressed. The very minimum responsibility for
forming viewpoints is to adopt a thoughtful, compassionate and a balanced view.
While many view this as a
political and territorial dispute, and it is to some degree – as I said at the
top, I do not think we can understand the situation properly unless we also see
it from a Biblical perspective, because Israel holds a unique place in God's
plan. Scripture repeatedly affirms that God chose Israel as His covenant nation
(Deuteronomy 7:6-8), although this does not mean that He loves Israel more than
other nations. Rather, God’s election of Israel was for the purpose of bringing
His light to the world (Isaiah 49:6) and ultimately ushering in the Messiah,
through whom salvation is available to all people (John 3:16, Romans 10:12-13).
And let me be clear once more, this divine priority does not exempt Israel from
judgment or criticism - on the contrary, the Bible foretells that Israel will
face immense tribulation in the last days (Zechariah 12:2-3, Matthew 24:15-22)
because of their ungodliness. At the same time, it also speaks of a future
peace when Israel will turn back to God and recognise Christ as the Messiah
(Zechariah 12:10, Romans 11:25-26).
The ongoing struggle over
Israel is not just a geopolitical issue but a spiritual one, tied to prophecies
yet to be fulfilled. I’ve often asked
myself how we square Israel being God's chosen people with some of the things
they've done wrong in the past 60 years. But I know that the Bible is clear
that God’s choice of Israel was not based on their righteousness or moral
superiority. In Deuteronomy 7:7-8, God explicitly says that He chose Israel not
because they were greater or better than other nations, but because of His love
and His covenant with their ancestors. And we can be frequently aghast at how,
throughout our reading of the Old Testament, Israel frequently disobeyed God,
engaged in idolatry, and even oppressed their own people. Yet, with His continued
grace, patience and mercy, even in spite of their huge failures, God remained
faithful to His promises. That the Lord shows each of us similar grace,
patience and mercy is something for which Christians, above all, ought to be
continually thankful. It is, at best, unbiblical and, at worst, deeply shameful
that so many Christians disregard the perspective of Israel in this conflict,
especially when in doing so they actively support groups that openly seek the
destruction of God’s people.
Let’s be clear about this.
As followers of Christ, we are called to seek truth, uphold justice, and love
our neighbours. And this requires careful discernment, especially in complex
global issues where suffering exists on all sides. But standing for truth does
not mean abandoning biblical convictions or aligning with those who promote
hatred and violence, even if you’re doing it accidentally by being unapprised
of what you’re really doing. What I read repeatedly from scripture is that no
individual Christian, church, or nation can truly thrive while standing in
opposition to Israel. Scripture is clear: God’s promises to Israel are
irrevocable, and His covenant with them endures. To position oneself against
Israel - whether through apathy, hostility, or de facto support for those who
seek its destruction - is to place oneself at odds with the purposes of God.
History testifies that blessing Israel brings blessing; while cursing it invites judgement.
And let me reiterate
something vital to the cause, lest you accuse me of being partisan. The Bible
actually shows that God holds Israel to a higher standard. In Amos 3:2, God
tells Israel, "You only have I chosen of all the families of the earth; therefore, I will punish you for all your sins”. This pattern
plays out in history: when Israel turned away from God, they faced judgment -
whether through exile (Babylonian captivity), defeat, or internal division. The
same principle applies today: being chosen does not exempt Israel from being
accountable for moral or political failures. And it’d be remiss to not point
out that the Israel of today is a secular nation-state, not the theocratic
kingdom that existed in biblical times. While modern Israel’s existence is a
fulfilment of prophecy (Ezekiel 37:21-22), its government is not necessarily
operating under biblical principles. Many Jews in Israel today are secular or
even atheist, and the nation’s policies are not always biblical ethics, which
means there is reaping in the sowing.
The sad truth is, the
nation of Israel has been in a constant state of war since its founding in
1948. It has been attacked multiple times by neighbouring countries and
terrorist groups (Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, later Iran through
proxies, and recently Hamas, Hezbollah, and other Islamic jihadis, including
Iran again). And I must stress this point too; even though Israel's behaviour
towards the Palestinians has been harsh, disproportionate, and reckless at times, especially around restrictive
measures, you can’t begin to understand this except through the lens of
perspective that understands being surrounded by countries and tribal
ideologies that want to wipe them off the map, and will use any squalid tactic
to achieve this. Israel is not just fighting a local territorial dispute; it is
fighting for its very survival in a region where multiple enemies openly call
for its total annihilation. Understanding this reality is key to making sense
of Israel’s decisions, however tough and imperfect they may seem on the
surface.
You may recall, in 2005,
Israel withdrew completely from Gaza, leaving it to Palestinian self-rule. The
hope was that Gaza would flourish, but instead, Hamas took over in 2007, and
since then, Gaza has been a launchpad for thousands of rocket attacks on Israeli
cities. Every ceasefire has been broken by Hamas. The presence of Israeli
military checkpoints and security measures may seem harsh, but they are there
because previous terrorist attacks - including suicide bombings in Israeli
cities - came from the West Bank. When Israel relaxed these security measures,
terror attacks increased, quelle surprise. It’s easy to look at Israel’s recent
policies toward the Palestinians - checkpoints, military operations,
restrictions on movement - and see them as oppressive. However, these measures
exist in no small part because past attempts at peace have been met with
terrorism, not cooperation. Even when Israel makes genuine attempts at inviting
peace, history shows that it has been
unable make peace with entities who calls for its destruction and denies its
people the right to exist. For all concerned in the Middle East, I hope and
pray things improve.
In the next
blog post on Israel, I will look at the situation in terms of biblical
prophecies, especially end time prophecies.